|
On
this page you will find some of
our very favorite UFO photos
taken over the years. We have
made an effort to distinguish
those photos that are as close
to undisputable evidence as
possible from those that may
have more rational explanations
or potential hoaxes. We hope
you'll enjoy it and that it
provokes some serious thought
about the UFO/USO phenomenon.
MT.
WASHINGTON, NEW HAMPSHIRE

 
DATE: 1870
TAKEN BY: Unknown
BACKGROUND: Originally a
"stereo" photograph;
purchased on eBay in 2002 by
Samuel M. Sherman, president of
Independent International
Pictures; an enhanced
version of the photo appears to
show "fins" and what looks
strangely like a swastika on its
side, yet no man-made flying
machines had been invented at
the time of this photo
COMMENT: The really interesting
thing about this picture is what
appears to be a reflection in
the upper left-hand corner of
the object. This would suggest a
metallic quality to the "craft".
I feel the "swastika" is a
matrixing issue, but pretty
strange nonetheless.
ST. PARIS, OHIO

 
DATE: May, 1932
SUBJECT IN PHOTO: Mr. George
Sutton
BACKGROUND: Street lamps, power
lines or telephone poles have
been ruled out as none either
existed or were present in the
photo.
COMMENT: My only question is
unless what we see is only a
portion of a bigger photo, then
the human subject appears to be
off-center. Whether it was
purposely done that way to show
the object, a cropped picture or
just an unsteady hand is
speculative at best. Given the
year (which is determined by the
license plate) of the picture,
it remains an interesting shot.
LOS ANGELES,
CALIFORNIA


DATE: February 25, 1942
TAKEN BY: Unknown
BACKGROUND: As air-raid sirens
went off all over the city,
residents of Culver City and
Santa Monica were told by air
wardens put out their lights and
thousands watched as
anti-aircraft guns fired 2,000
rounds of 12 lb. shells at an
object that was first thought to
be a Japanese aircraft;
floodlights illuminated the
object as it was fired upon; the
photo above is from the original
LA Times negative of the event;
renowned photo analyst Dr. Bruce
Maccabee has declared the
picture valid
COMMENT: What we see here is
taken from the negative of the
original picture, which creates
a more sharply defined image.
Negatives will also help
determine whether or not we are
looking at a solid object. This
incident took place at a time
when paranoia of foreign attack
was at its peak in the
post-Pearl Harbor bombing. This
is why civilians on (especially)
the West Coast were trained to
fire AA guns. Bottom line:
something solid was in the air
that night and was not harmed in
any way by the guns.
PHOENIX,
ARIZONA

DATE: July 7, 1947
TAKEN BY: William Rhodes who
took two photographs of an
object circling his home
BACKGROUND: Experts say these
photographs do not show
imperfections either in the
subject or the camera used;
allegedly, this object closely
resembles that which crashed in
Roswell, N.M. in the same year;
object spiraled down from 5,000
to 2,000 feet and then rose at a
45 degree angle; speed was
estimated to be 400-600 mph; the
size of the object was estimated
at 20-30 feet across; part of
the famous UFO wave of 1947.
COMMENT: Interesting comments
about the similarity to the
Roswell craft. I had seen
artists' rendering that alleged
craft, but viewing this picture
gives me a better understanding
of at least the source.
CZAPLINEK,
CZECHSLOVAKIA

DATE: 1947
TAKEN BY: Unknown
BACKGROUND: Photo taken by
subject who was looking over a
mountain; photo manipulation
would be extremely difficult in
1947.
COMMENT: Pictures taken
many years ago in foreign
countries are always
fascinating, especially in
Communist-controlled areas as
flights of fancy and creativity
were not a big part of the
socialist doctrine. Assuming
this was taken by a common
person not connected with the
military or science fields
(where all of the more advanced
methods of photo technology were
directed), it would be hard to
fake this.
MORRISTOWN,
N.J.

DATE: July 10, 1947
TAKEN BY: John H. Janssen,
editor of the Daily Record (an
American aviation journal) who
was flying his own plane from
Morristown Airport in New
Jersey.
BACKGROUND: Janssen saw six
glowing objects with hazy rings
around them flying above him in
a formation; he grabbed his
camera and shot four of the six
objects he saw; two weeks later,
he encountered a similar group
of objects and reported his
plane sputtered and stopped
running, but did not plummet to
the ground - instead it seemed
to float suspended in mid-air.
COMMENT: One has to be
dubious of the "tractor beam"
story that Janssen tells later,
but research shows this
particular photo cannot be
debunked by experts.
McMINNVILLE,
OREGON

 
DATE: May 11, 1950
TAKEN BY: Paul A. Trent
BACKGROUND: Mrs.
Trent was tending to her rabbits
outside when she noticed the
object approaching from the
northeast; she called to her
husband Paul who got his box
camera and snapped off three
shots of the object; it took
several minutes to get all the
shots because box cameras in the
50's had to be wound which took
considerable time; for over 50
years, no expert in the field of
film analysis has been able to
explain the photos; the story
and the pictures were featured
in the June 26, 1950 issue of
Life magazine.
COMMENT: Also one of the most
controversial UFO photos ever
taken. Bruce Maccabee came under
great criticism by those in the
skeptical world who were adamant
this was too good to be true,
especially Philip Klass, but
evidence demonstrates that these
simple farm people taking this
picture knew nothing of UFOs at
the time they witnessed this.
GREAT FALLS,
MONTANA

DATE: August 15, 1950
TAKEN BY: Nicholas Mariana, GM
of the Great Falls Selectrics
baseball team. BACKGROUND:
This is actually a film capture
from a 16mm movie shot by
Mariana; the film at one time
was listed as top secret;
objects were about 50 feet
across and 50 yards apart;
Mariana took the film to the
USAF, who declared the film "too
dark (?) to distinguish any
recognizable objects."; there is
also evidence that the Air Force
tampered with the film while it
was in their possession, taking
out some truly compelling
footage early in the film.
COMMENT: Did a lot of reading up
on this film footage and am
convinced that the Air Force
bumbled this in a big way. It
becomes more apparent that 2-3
feet of film were cut out of the
beginning of the original
footage. More noteworthy is that
between 1952 and 1976, even more
frames were removed. This was
concluded after an interview
with Mr. Mariana and comparisons
to what had been documented in
the National Archives. This
sighting was subsequently
declared "unknown" in the Condon
Report and by Col. Edward
Ruppelt, director of Project
Blue Book.
LUBBOCK, TEXAS

DATE: August 30, 1951
TAKEN BY: Carl Hart Jr., 18
years old
BACKGROUND: Three Texas
Technological College
professors, Dr. W. I. Robinson,
Dr. A. G. Oberg, and W. L.
Ducker were talking in
Robinson's backyard at 9:10 PM,
August 25. when they all saw a
number of lights fly across the
night sky; Hart's
photographs show 30 objects in a
formation in the sky a few
nights later; these objects were
also witnessed by dozens others
who were watching the skies
nightly after the initial
sighting took place; one
"official" explanation that
these were plover birds was
dismissed by game wardens who
said plovers never flew in
groups more than three
These sightings would become
known simply as "The Lubbock
Lights".
COMMENT: While the physics
laboratory at Wright-Patterson
Air Force Base declared the
photo to be genuine, you gotta
love the explanation by Col.
Ruppelt who eventually rejected
the plover explanation, but
stated that the lights were
actually an explainable natural
phenomena. What he could not
disclose was who had hit on that
answer and what they actually
were because the man who figured
it out had requested complete
anonymity and by telling us we
would easily figure out who it
was. Whaaat!??
LAC
CHAUVET, FRANCE

DATE: July 18, 1952
TAKEN BY: André Fregnale -
engineer and photographer
BACKGROUND: Pictures taken by
Fregnale while walking around
Lake Chauvet; film was first
analyzed by Claude Poher,
director of the GEPAN, and he
deemed that the photograph was
not a fraud but a genuine UFO;
in 1994 the photos were
developed and analyzed by Pierre
Guerin, a well respected
astronomer and confirmed the UFO
object as real. The photographs
have been scrutinized by many
experts and all have found them
to be real shots of a real UFO.
SALEM, MA. COAST GUARD
STATION

DATE: July 16, 1952
TAKEN BY: Coast Guard Officer
Shell R. Alpert
BACKGROUND: Picture was taken at
9:35 a.m.; Alpert was in a lab
when he saw the lights and
called for Coastguardsman Thomas
Flaherty who was in a sick bay
close by to confirm what he was
seeing; lights dimmed, then got
brighter, so Alpert grabbed a
camera and shot this photo.
COMMENT: First impressions
dictate that you are looking at
a reflection of interior lights
off a window that Alpert shot
this picture through, but it was
determined that this photo was
shot through a screen on a window,
not glass. It would also stand
to reason that a light
reflection would be noticeable
on a daily basis and would not
be a surprise to anyone.
TRINIDADE
ISLAND, BRAZIL


DATE: January 16, 1957
TAKEN BY: Almiro Barauna,
free-lance photographer and
specialist in submarine
photography
BACKGROUND:
Trinidade Island was a base for
US and Brazilian warships during
WWII; an oceanographic and
meteorological station was
planned and the Brazilian Navy
was prepping the location by
doing studies aboard the
Almirante Saldanha; crew members
spotted the object moving toward
the island at about 12:15 p.m.
and summoned Barauna to snap
pictures; 50 witnesses observed
the object as it flew past the
island and off to sea; the
photos were authenticated by the
Brazilian Navy and released to
the public by President
Joscelino Kubitschek.
COMMENT: I was just a youngster
interested in UFOs when I first
saw this picture in a magazine.
Considering the credibility and
background of the witnesses and
the failure by photographic
experts to ever explain away the
picture as a hoax or something
else, this is arguably to this
day the best photographic
evidence of an extraterrestrial
visitation.
LAKE
ISABELLA,
CALIFORNIA

credit: Robert
Stanley @ Unicus
DATE: 1957
TAKEN BY: B.C. (subject's full
name unknown)
BACKGROUND: Deemed authentic by
Kodak labs; photograph was taken
by photographer and his fiancee
who were riding their Harley
through the southern Sierra
Nevada's, in an area in what is
now Lake Isabella, California;
while taking random pictures,
this showed up on one of the
prints; the object was not
visible to them when the photo
was taken.
COMMENT: This sparked an
interesting discussion of the
theory of objects, while being
hidden to the naked eye, showing
up in photographs. This
suggested these craft were
traveling through dimensions and
portals and appearing and
disappearing at will.
EDWARDS AFB


DATE: September, 1957
TAKEN BY: USAF test pilot (name
unknown)
BACKGROUND: The UFO is following
a B-57 twin jet; it was not
discovered until the photograph
was developed; An
excellent photo for that time
period.
COMMENT: A very intriguing
photo. Seems almost too good to
be true, but given the metallic
composition of the object and
the fact it was submitted by the
military gives it more
credibility than most. If this
is real, it must have caused
quite a stir in military
circles.
YACANTO, ARGENTINA

DATE: July 3, 1960
TAKEN BY: Hugo F. Niotti, Capt.
Argentine Air Force
BACKGROUND: Niotti was driving
from Yacanto toward Cordoba and
at approximately 4:30 PM, he was
in the area of Villa General
Belgrano, about 70 Km from the
when he suddenly noticed a
rather close and unusual object
hovering near the ground to the
right of the road; he
grabbed his camera and took this
one picture; it was deemed
authentic by Servicio de
Informaciones de Aeronautica,
which is an AAF technical
service; surprisingly, there is
horse in the center of this
picture, whose attention appears
to be focused on the object.
COMMENT: Not sure about the
horse looking at the UFO part,
may be a coincidence, but it
warrants attention due to the
credibility of the witness
involved. I sometimes question
the competency of analysis in
other countries and how far they
will go to debunk such things,
but at face value the picture
appears to be valid.
SOLWAY FIRTH
PHOTO, U.K.

-
 
DATE: May 24, 1964
TAKEN BY: Jim Templeton,
former fireman from Carlisle
BACKGROUND: Here's a bizarre
photo that we'll call
UFO-related. Templeton took his
young daughter out to the
marshes overlooking the Solway
Firth to take some photographs;
upon processing a few days
later, an employee of the drug
store mentioned it was a shame
that someone walked by and
spoiled the shot;
Templeton said there was nobody
else there except his wife and
daughter; the case was brought
to the Kodak company who, unable
to solve the mystery, offered
free film for life to anyone who
could explain the photograph -
to date, no one has. Templeton
eventually was visited by two
men (MIBs?) who suggested he
tell everyone that someone had
walked by - he refused.
COMMENT: A very famous photo
that made the rounds for years
and is still a big question mark
to this day. The first
impression is that these folks
have to be making this up, but
as double-exposures and
photographic overlays have
definitely been ruled out, one
only has their word to base an
opinion on. For what it's worth,
figures similar to this were
reported being captured on film
at the Woomera Testing Range in
Australia during a "Blue Streak"
missile test. Those missiles
were manufactured in Spadeadam,
UK, just a few miles from Solway
Firth.
HILLSDALE, MICHIGAN AND THE
SWAMP GAS CASE

 
DATE(S): March 20, 1966 (L);
March 21, 1966 (R)
TAKEN BY: Unknown
BACKGROUND: Over a 6-7 day
period in March of 1966,
Michigan residents from
Washtenaw to Hillsdale witnessed
a huge UFO flap. Washtenaw
County residents Frank Mannor
and his son reported to the
Sheriff's Department that they
had seen a flying saucer land in
a nearby swamp. Following the
object into the bog, they saw
the brightly lit object raise up
and move directly over their
heads. Soon it disappeared into
the night sky. Shortly
thereafter, Patrolman Robert
Hunawill of the Dexter Village
Police saw the same object, or
another just like it, hover over
his patrol car. Soon it was
joined by three other UFOs.
There were several photographs
taken of the object before the
sightings ended; one a classic
photo of the UFO sitting on the
road. (See photo on left).
There were numerous sightings
during the Michigan wave of
1966. The case itself is very
memorable for another important
event that occurred. Project
Blue Book sent
Dr.
J. Allen Hynek
to investigate the sighting
reports. At first, Hynek agreed
that there was something going
on in the Michigan skies. But
after consulting with the Blue
Book headquarters, he changed
his mind, and said that the
sightings were nothing more than
"swamp gas."
The case that prompted his
conversion occurred in Hillsdale
County, Michigan, on March 21,
1966, and involves the photo
shown here. At about 10:30 pm a
resident of the women's
dormitory at Hillsdale College
reported a strange object in the
sky. County Civil Defense
director William E. Van Horn
responded and confirmed that a
bright glowing object was indeed
bouncing across a nearby hollow
and then became airborne. Hynek,
who died in 1986, dismissed the
Hillsdale sighting as "swamp
gas." Within two weeks, however,
he changed not only his opinion
about the sighting, but also
sides in the UFO debate.
(ufologie.net)
ROARING RIVER, MISSOURI


DATE: November 22, 1966
TAKEN BY: Unknown hunter
BACKGROUND: Two hunters on a
camping/deer hunting trip were
startled to see smoke coming
from where they had set up their
tents; when they bolted
back to their campsite, they saw
their tent and its contents had
been burned (L) and the tops of
trees broken and badly singed
(C); one of them then snapped a
picture of an object they saw
rising out of a nearby valley
and came to within 300 feet of
them (R).
CALGARY,
ALBERTA

DATE: July 3, 1967
TAKEN BY: Warren Smith
BACKGROUND: Dr. J.
Allen Hynek stated: "best
daylight disc photograph I have
personally investigated.";
Smith and two of his friends
were returning from a weekend
prospecting trip when they
spotted the object; Smith
grabbed the camera, and took two
photos of the object; it
was also stated by the witnesses
that the UFO dropped some type
of liquid material; the object
was about 40-50 feet in
diameter.
PIGEON LAKE, ALBERTA

DATE: July 3, 1967
TAKEN BY: Douglas Dennis
BACKGROUND: Mr. Dennis, fishing
at Pigeon Lake, near Buckhorn,
Alberta, was amazed by the
appearance of a soft, orange
colored ball of light in the sky
above him. It descended quite
low, and Mr. Dennis took his
camera and snapped a color
picture of the brightly luminous
mass hovering in the air. This
remarkable night photograph
clearly shows a round luminous
object directly overhead. Others
present observed the object and
Mr. Dennis photographing it.
Coincidentally taken the same
night in the same province as
the photo above it in Calgary.
(ufologie.net)
CLUJ, ROMANIA

 
DATE: August 18, 1968
TAKEN BY: Emil Barnea
BACKGROUND: Emil Barnea and
his girlfriend Miss Matea walked
in the forest with a couple of
friends. His friend shouted that
she sees "something," and when
he joined her he also saw a
large round object, of metallic
appearance and shining in the
sun in the sky above the top of
the trees. Amazed, Barnea
remembered all the same that he
had his camera and while the UFO
advanced slowly changing
direction and increasing its
luminosity, then suddenly
accelerating until it
disappeared at the horizon. He
had time to shoot four
photographs.
The negative were examined to
see whether they were tampered
with by a photographer reporter
of Cluj, and then by a
specialist in photography of the
Ager Press agency in Bucharest.
Both concluded that there were
no trace of any trickery. The
film was again examined by a
commercial photo laboratory
which also considered it
perfectly normal, without traces
of falsification. Neither Barnea
nor his friend Miss Mattea knew
much about flying saucers and
UFOs, this was only normal since
in Romania in 1968, books about
UFOs weren't sold.
(ufologie.net)
STYRIA, AUSTRIA

DATE: May 23, 1971
TAKEN BY: Rudi Nagora, German
musician
BACKGROUND: Nagora and his
wife were vacationing in Styria
and after parking their car for
a look around he heard a
"whizzing" sound from above him.
Looking up, he saw a shiny, disc
which was silhouetted against
the clouds. After running to
tell his wife, he grabbed his
camera and took 12 photographs
of the object. His photos have
been declared legitimate by a
host of experts, and they have
never been debunked.
FLORADAD,
URUGUAY

DATE: July 11,
1971
TAKEN BY:
Hector Delgado
BACKGROUND:
Delgado, a
horticulturist,
was working in
his greenhouse
at the rear of
his home in
Florida,
Uruguay.
Suddenly, he
heard a high
pitched humming
sound, that
increased and
decreased in
volume and tone
over a period of
time. He laid
down the tools
he was using and
went to the
doorway to look
out. He saw,
some 200m from
his position and
no more than 50m
above the
ground, a silver
disc-shaped
object moving
smoothly,
suspended in the
air. After a few
moments of
indecision,
Rufino ran to
the house to get
his camera and
raced back,
fearing the
strange object
might leave.
"When I took the
first photograph
the UFO was
still moving
very slowly
toward the
south, but I had
barely snapped
it when the
object
drastically
altered its
velocity and
trajectory and
commenced some
climbing
maneuvers as it
increased its
elevation above
the ground,"
declared the
witness. (ufologie)
LAGO DE COTE,
COSTA RICA

 
DATE: September 4, 1971
TAKEN BY: Costa Rican
government
BACKGROUND: The
photo above (cropped and
enlarged) was taken by a Costa
Rican government mapping plane
during an aerial mapping
mission. This UFO photograph is
unique for several reasons. 1)
The photograph was taken by a
high-quality, professional
camera. 2) The unidentified
object is plainly visible
against the uniformly dark
background of the lake and
appears in sharp focus. 3) The
camera was aimed downward and
the plane was flying at a known,
fixed altitude (10,000 feet),
which makes it easy to calculate
a maximum size for the object
(683 feet).
The plane carried a crew of
four; a specialist in aerial
photography, a geographer, a
topographer, and the pilot. No
member of the crew stated that
they saw anything unusual during
the routine flight.
(ufoevidence.com)
LOUISVILLE, KENTUCKY

DATE: October 3, 1973
TAKEN BY: Unknown
BACKGROUND: "It was about
2:00 pm I'd guess. I didn't hear
anything. I had just seen two
chipmunks scampering around the
base of a Sycamore tree. Then I
looked up and, by God, there it
was...this round flying saucer.
That's all I know to call it,"
reported an electronics
technician from Louisville. The
man took six pictures in all,
two of which were blurred
because of the object's rapid
departure. The pictures and
negatives were examined by the
COURIER-JOURNAL photo staff, and
if the photos were faked, they
were fakes of the highest
quality. There were no other
sightings in this area at this
time. (ufoevidence)
ONTARIO, CANADA

DATE: 1973
TAKEN BY: Unknown
BACKGROUND: The witness took
a series of photographs of the
object. The circular object is
clearly seen moving about a
clump of trees. The photos have
been deemed authentic by various
photographic experts. A good,
clear image for the time period.
(ufocasefiles)
CANARY ISLANDS, SPAIN

DATE: June 22, 1976
TAKEN BY: Unknown tourist
BACKGROUND: A large
unidentified luminous phenomenon
was observed throughout the
Spanish Canary Islands.
Newspaper headlines proclaimed
the following day that
"thousands of people" had seen a
"spectacular luminous
phenomena" which "lasted twenty
minutes and was observed from
Tenerife, La Palma and La Gomera."
The most sensational aspect was
the experience of a medical
doctor and his taxi driver, who
reported a transparent sphere
with two tall entities inside.
The Spanish Air Force assigned
an investigative adjutant to
review the case:
"Then,
numerous witnesses belonging to
different positions and cultural
strata, saw it with similar
characteristics in the Grand
Canary island. Therefore, the
fact that a very strange and
peculiar aerial phenomenon
occurred on the night of 22 June
is a true and proven fact, as
incredible as its behavior and
conditions may seem."
"If we
study as a whole the three
reports issued up to the present
(1/75, 1/76, and 2/76), we
should have to think seriously
of the necessity of considering
the possibility of accepting the
hypothesis that a craft of
unknown origin, propelled by an
equally unknown energy, is
moving freely over the skies in
the Canaries."
SOUTH HERWANG, INDONESIA

DATE: November 11, 1976
TAKEN BY: Tony Hartono
BACKGROUND: At 2:00pm in
November of 1976, Mr. Tony
Hartono, an engineer, had taken
photographs of the off- shore
oil rig his company ARCO
Indonesia was building in order
to illustrate his progress
report. He had one left and was
standing on a platform facing
the sea, wondering what else he
could shoot to finish the film
roll. Suddenly his attention was
attracted to a little dark speck
in the sky which was growing
larger as it approached. It
became a yellowish color as it
continued its approach and came
quite near the launch he was in.
He used his last shot to capture
this object on film. (ufoevidence)
COLFAX, WISCONSIN


DATE: April 19, 1978
TAKEN BY: Officer Mark
Coltrane
BACKGROUND:
Officer Coltrane was on patrol
in the vicinity of Colfax, a
small town with a thousands of
inhabitants in Wisconsin, USA.
At midday, he decided to stop
the car to eat something, in a
small isolated area. He noted
that his radio was emitting
crackles. He then noticed a
metallic looking disc raising
towards the the sky at a short
distance from the parking space.
While the object seemed to move
towards him, Coltrane picked up
his Polaroid camera, came out of
the car and snapped some
photographs. The object was so
close in one of the images that
it is possible to notice some
details of its lower surface. In
[the second] photograph the
object is starting to move away.
The total observation lasted a
few minutes, the object being
being lost from his sight when
it accelerated and fled in the
distance. Coltrane, shocked by
the sighting, remained in
amazement for two hours without
saying anything, by fear of
being ridiculed when he would
have to submit his report to his
chiefs.
MOTONAU, NEW ZEALAND

DATE: October 27, 1979
TAKEN BY: Unknown
BACKGROUND: Two former Air
Force photographic analysts
called this picture,
"inscrutable." In other words, a
mystery. This one photo is from
a series of photos, none of the
others had an unknown in it. The
object was not seen nor heard at
the time.
AJUSCO PARK, MEXICO


DATE: January 1981
TAKEN BY: Carlos Diaz
BACKGROUND: Mexican
photographer Carlos Diaz pulled
into a deserted car park at
Ajusco Park near Mexico City. He
was on an assignment for a
magazine, and had arranged to
meet a journalist who was yet to
arrive. Diaz sat in his car,
preparing his camera for the job
ahead. Impatiently, Diaz began
to look at his watch. Suddenly,
his attention was caught by a
strange yellow glow coming from
the valley below him. At first
he thought it was a forest fire,
but, an instant later, the
source of light revealed itself
to be a large, orange,
oval-shaped UFO, slowly hovering
about 30 meters from his car.
This was to be the beginning of
one of the most compelling
continuous contact cases in UFO
history as Diaz reports he is
contacted by the same beings to
this day and has delivered a
strong environmental message
from these beings. Professor of
Psychiatry at Harvard Medical
School, John Mack. Mack has a
long history of dealing with
abductees and contactees and
believes that the Diaz case is
among the most convincing he has
come across.
Interestingly, the
photographs were also analyzed
by Dr Robert Nathan at NASA's
Jet Propulsion Laboratory in
California. Nathan, a notorious
UFO skeptic, stated that he
could find no evidence of a
fake. Certainly, for many who
have examined the three images,
the first shot is the most
impressive. In it, the orange
glowing craft can be seen
through the windshield of the
car, and light from the object
is reflected both off the car's
bonnet and off the metal guard
rail by the side of the road.
These, in particular, are
details that experts claim are
extremely difficult to fake.
VANCOUVER, CANADA

DATE: October 8, 1981
TAKEN BY: Hannah McRoberts
BACKGROUND: At about 11:00
A.M., McRoberts is with her
husband and their daughter on a
service area close to Kelsey
Bay, on the East coast of the
Vancouver Island. During their
pause they notice a cloud which
passes on the top of a
mountainous peak and makes the
impression of an erupting
volcano spitting a huge vapor
blast. They find the scene
rather amusing and worth a
picture. Several days
afterwards, when the photographs
are developed, they notice on
one of the photograph that there
is a disc-type object in the
sky. They are surprised, as they
do not remember noticing
anything in the sky at the time
when they shot the photograph.
They contact David Dodge,
director of the of Vancouver
planetarium. He examines the
picture and remains disturbed by
this singular photograph. He
contacts ufologist, David
Powell, who analyzes the
pictures and cannot find any
evidence of tampering. Richard
F. Haines, a retired NASA
scientist who became a famous
ufologist, becomes interested in
the Vancouver case. He carries
out a thorough analysis of the
negative and cannot discover any
tampering either. His analysis
is inserted in the scientific
report of the Sturrock Panel.
WATERBURY,
CONNECTICUT

DATE: May 26, 1987
TAKEN BY: Randy Etting
BACKGROUND: Mr. Etting
was taking a walk outside his
home. A commercial airline pilot
with over 30 years experience,
he always looked at the sky. On
the night he took the
photograph, he saw a number of
orange and red lights
approaching from the west. He
got his binoculars and called
his neighbors to come outside.
The object, by this time was a
great deal closer and seemed to
be over I-84, just east of
Etting's home... the lights were
shimmering like distortion from
engine heat, but he could hear
no sound. Etting stated: "As the
UFO passed over I-84, cars in
both the east and west bound
lanes began pulling over and
stopping. The UFO displayed a
semi-circular pattern of very
bright multicolored lights. Five
motorists reported that, as the
object became visible, a number
of cars lost power and had to
pull off the highway." A State
Police officer [who wishes to
remain anonymous] sent to
investigate photographed the
object. "... Dr. Bruce Maccabee...
[analyzed the photo]. His
findings indicate the object was
huge, perhaps over a thousand
feet across, and that the lights
showed a definite pattern. He
also indicated the lights seemed
to have been flashing very
quickly in some sort of
sequence, giving the impression
that some were out of focus
while others were sharp."
PETIT RECHAIN, BELGIUM

DATE: April 4, 1990
TAKEN BY: Unknown
BACKGROUND: One of the most
famous UFO pictures ever taken.
The photographer, to anyone's
knowledge, still remains
unnamed. Taken on an April night
during a well known "wave," the
photo very clearly shows a
triangle-shaped object with
lights. One of the best proofs
of UFOs we have, especially of a
triangle. Original photo was too
dark to show object outline, and
had to be lightened. Occurred
during the "Belgian Wave"
beginning in 1989.
SZABOLCS-SZATMAR,
HUNGARY


DATE: October 27, 1996
TAKEN BY: Lajos Kosina
BACKGROUND: Lajos Kosina was
visiting his girl friends
parents house in the small
village of Erpatak in the county
of Szabolcs-Szatmar, Hungary.
Lajos’s girlfriend posed for one
snapshot in her parents garden
and no one noticed anything
unusual in the sky at the time.
HUFON have studied the
photograph using both optical
and computer techniques on the
original negative and have
concluded that that the UFO is
not a result of a film fault,
nor is it a small model
suspended on a wire. HUFON
researchers are convinced that
it is a genuine UFO and not the
result of a hoax.
PHOENIX, ARIZONA

DATE: March 13, 1997
TAKEN BY: Unknown
BACKGROUND: The Phoenix
Lights UFO incident is a complex
series of events that took place
on March 13, 1997 over the
states of Nevada, Arizona, and
possibly New Mexico, and which
would quickly become known as
the "Phoenix Lights" sightings.
It involved sightings by tens,
or perhaps even hundreds, of
thousands of witnesses on the
ground, and it gave rise to a
storm of controversy over what
had caused the event.
Investigators may never be able
to re-assemble all of the facts
surrounding the events that took
place over Arizona on the night
of March 13, 1997. However,
there is no doubt in the minds
of most that what occurred was
extraordinarily bizarre in
nature, and that many thousands
of witnesses can attest to the
events. (see also: Top Ten UFO
Encounters in the UFO/USO
section for a complete report on
this sighting)
KARAGOL, TURKEY


DATE: February 19, 1996
TAKEN BY: Cem Arat and Mehmet
Safak
BACKGROUND:
"For at least a
hundred times", Arat and Safak
returned to the site at the
Yamanlar Mountain Peak near
Karagol, where they saw and
photographed a strange object in
February 1996. This time, one of
them was called up by the Army,
so they decided to go a last
time as a kind of "farewell
party". And this time another
UFO showed up! They shot a lot
of pictures, but the object was
moving so fast, that they caught
it on only two. After their
military service, in the
beginning of the year 2000, they
contacted a local TV channel and
told their story. Their photos
were examined by an expert of
the Aegaean University of Izmir,
Dr. Ahmet Imancer, head of the
Photography and Graphic Dept. He
stated that he was convinced
they were not a hoax and
estimated the diameter of the
object to be about 20 meters (60
feet), its distance about 500
meters (500 yards). The Turkish
UFO research center SIRIUS
requested another analysis by
the "On Photography House" in
Istanbul, which, on June 16,
2000, stated: "As a result of
our analysis of the 35 mm
negative film, we concluded that
the images on the negatives are
genuine and there is no
indication of a hoax on the
photos delivered from these
negatives. The negatives and the
photographs were examined by
computer and no modifications
were found on them."
BUDAPEST, HUNGARY

 
DATE: September 29, 2001
TAKEN BY: Unnamed Hungarian
military pilot
BACKGROUND: A military pilot
recorded a spectacular video of
a silver disk object on this
date. The craft was flying to
his left side and then moved
very fast past him in the clouds
as can be seen in the video. "I
was on a flight over Budapest,
Hungary," said the pilot, who
has requested that his name be
withheld until the official
inquiry by the Hungarian
Ministry of Defense is complete.
"To my left I saw a bright metal
aircraft that was the shape of a
perfect disk. I was careful to
film the object, not to try and
chase it since it I could not
match its speed. As I was flying
a reconnaissance aircraft, I got
the idea to film it and used our
equipment." Officials at the
Ministry of Defense would not
answer questions about the video
when asked and warned that
officially they have no comment.
Despite the denial, when
informed of the pilot's name,
they did acknowledge that the he
was a real air force pilot and
that it was true that he flew
photo reconnaissance airplanes.
The pilot considers the video he
made to be his property and not
the Hungarian governments as he
was flying the plane while not
on duty and was transporting it
as a favor to save the
government money. He has now
hired an attorney and wants the
video to be released to the
public. He hopes the release of
a few frames will make this
happen.
SKUROWA, POLAND

 
DATE: July 26, 2003
TAKEN BY: Anonymous
BACKGROUND: The unidentified
object was first noticed as it
flew above the city of Skurowa
at an extremely high altitude.
Then it changed course and flew
over a market. The initial
photos were taken while the
witness (who maintains his
anonymity) was in his garden,
but when the object began to
move away, he looked for a
better vantage point. He quickly
ran to his balcony, and took
several more photos of the
object. As the photos were
taken, the object was not very
clear to the witness, who hoped
that the film would show the
object good enough for study.
The report stirred enough
publicity in the area that a
local newspaper carried the
report with photograph. The
witness is soliciting
corroboration from others,
through the newspaper, who saw
and / or photographed the
unknown object.
STARKSBORO, VERMONT

DATE: January 29, 2004
TAKEN BY:
R.W. Martin
BACKGROUND:
"On January 29th 2004, on the
way home from picking up my 6
year old from kindergarten I saw
something in the sky. I grabbed
a disposable camera that I had
in the car and shot through the
windshield, then jumped out of
the car and snapped a second and
then it was gone. I got two
photos (close-up above, full
images below). To me it was a
UFO, but maybe there is another
explanation? The object looks a
little different in each photo--
maybe it was turning or
whatever. I wish I had gotten a
better shot or more of them."
FAIR USE NOTICE: This page may
contain copyrighted material the
use of which has not been
specifically authorized by the
copyright owner. This website
distributes this material
without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in
receiving the included
information for research and
educational purposes. We believe
this constitutes a fair use of
any such copyrighted material as
provided for in 17 U.S. C 107

|